Guest blog post by FHRD Member, RSM Malta
In Malta’s skills-scarce market, businesses need every means available to attract, engage and retain talent. Pay matters, but a competitor can match a salary. What it cannot match as easily is the experience of working for you: how decisions are made, how people are treated, whether good work gets noticed and whether poor behaviour is tolerated.
In other words, culture.
Culture can be an important driver of organisational performance. McKinsey’s long-running research on organisational health, of which culture is an important component, has found that organisations in the top quartile for health generate around three times the total shareholder returns of those in the bottom quartile. If you want capable people to stay, care about the work and perform close to their potential, culture should not be left to chance.
The challenge is that culture emerges incrementally and often unconsciously.
In a start-up or micro-enterprise, the initial culture tends to align closely with the owner’s values and habits, which are usually focused first on survival and then on growth. As the business scales, it must decide which elements of that early culture to retain as founders step back from day-to-day decisions. Each new hire influences the culture, while growth brings a more diverse workforce and greater complexity. A clear culture gives people a shared way of working, but without deliberate effort it can fragment into silos.
Cultural evolution is often haphazard, slow or both. What once served the organisation well may eventually become an impediment as circumstances change.
Culture itself is a common term but one that is not always well understood. At its core, it is the accumulated shared learning of a group as it solves problems, with approaches that work well enough eventually being passed on to new members. Over time, these lessons become norms around how people think, decide, communicate and act. They are also reflected in practices such as how performance is defined, measured and rewarded.
Some elements are easy to see but harder to interpret. Organisations may have clearly stated values expressed through strategy documents, company communications and what leaders say. Beneath those, however, sit assumptions that can become so embedded that they are rarely questioned.
For example, an assumption that revenue growth is paramount may translate into a stated value of continually seeking new opportunities. In practice, this could result in pursuing new leads without investing sufficiently in the resources needed to scale, potentially at the expense of existing clients. What was a critical priority in the organisation’s early years may eventually become a risk, yet the assumption behind it may remain largely unexamined.
“Culture eats strategy for breakfast” has become a cliché for a reason. Strategies ultimately depend on people’s ability and willingness to execute them. Culture shapes behaviour, and those behaviours can either support the strategy or work against it. Even the right strategy can therefore encounter difficulties when organisational culture is disregarded.
Making the unconscious conscious
Healthy cultures examine themselves, and the practices involved do not necessarily need to be complicated.
A short review after a major project can ask what went well and what the team would change. Stay interviews with valued employees can take place before they begin considering opportunities elsewhere. Leaders can ask their teams directly what they should do differently and, importantly, demonstrate that they act on the answers.
Customer feedback and regular culture pulse surveys can also provide useful insight.
Leadership teams can begin by asking:
-
What are our values, and where do they show up day to day?
-
What practices, rituals, stories and structural elements bring those values to life?
-
What assumptions sit behind them, where did they come from and are they still relevant?
-
What are we rewarding, incentivising, discouraging and tolerating?
-
Do people see expectations, rewards, progression and accountability as fair?
-
Are our behaviours contradicting our stated values, particularly around promotion, accountability and pay?




